DroneHoax.com - Isaac's Alien Treaty?

Isaac wrote the following under the heading, "Some Explanation for the Recent Sightings"

One question I can answer for sure is why they're suddenly here.

<snip>

The reason they're suddenly visible, however, is another matter entirely. These crafts, assuming they're anything like the hardware I worked with in the 80's (assuming they're better, in fact), are equipped with technology that enables invisibility. That ability can be controlled both on board the craft, and remotely. However, what's important in this case is that this invisibility can also be disrupted by other technology. Think of it like radar jamming. I would bet my life savings (since I know this has happened before) that these craft are becoming visible and then returning to invisibility arbitrarily, probably unintentionally, and undoubtedly for only short periods, due to the activity of a kind of disrupting technology being set off elsewhere, but nearby. I'm especially sure of this in the case of the Big Basin sightings, were the witnesses themselves reported seeing the craft just appear and disappear. This is especially likely because of the way the witness described one of the appearances being only a momentary flicker, which is consistent with the unintentional, intermittent triggering of such a device.

It's no surprise that these sightings are all taking place in California , and especially the Saratoga/South Bay area. Not far from Saratoga is Mountain View/Sunnyvale, home to Moffett Field and the NASA Ames Research center. Again, I'd be willing to bet just about anything that the device capable of hijacking the cloaking of these nearby craft was inadvertently triggered, probably during some kind of experiment, at the exact moment they were being seen. Miles away, in Big Basin, the witnesses were in the right place at the right time and saw the results of this disruption with their own eyes. God knows what else was suddenly appearing in the skies at that moment, and who else may have seen it. I've had some direct contact with this device, or at least a device capable of the same thing, and this kind of mistake is not unprecedented. I am personally aware of at least one other incident in which this kind of technology was accidentally set off, resulting in the sudden visibility of normally invisible things. The only difference is that these days, cameras are a lot more common!

The technology itself isn't ours, or at least it wasn't in the 80's. Much like the technology in these crafts themselves, the device capable of remotely hijacking a vehicle's clacking comes from a non-human source too. Why we were given this technology has never been clear to me, but it's responsible for a lot. Our having access to this kind of device, along with our occasionally haphazard experimentation on them, has lead to everything from cloaking malfunctions like this to full-blown crashes. I can assure you that most (and in my opinion all) incidents of UFO crashes or that kind of thing had more to do with our meddling with extremely powerful technology at an inopportune time than it did mechanical failure on their part. Trust me, those things don't fail unless something even more powerful than them makes them fail (intentionally or not).

As you can see, Isaac has rather specific ideas regarding why he believes that the Drones have suddenly became momentarily visible.
Isaac states unequivocally:

While it's clear to me what Isaac meant, the subsequently ascribed ambiguous intent of the statement by pro-Drone believers has lead to the same believers dismissing what I believe is blatantly obvious, it's the statement:

When considered within the context of the immediately preceding sentences, i.e.:

Then the statement: "Why we were given this technology has never been clear to me" is in my opinion obviously referring
to the fact that the word, "we " means, "humans" and it clearly states we have been "given" the technology by a "non-human source".

Firstly, I should perhaps point out that the pro-Drone believers that I have seen respond to this are mainly members of the DRT (or their forum) so obviously it can't really be accepted as a fair representation of people who believe the Drones aren't a CGI hoax. But that's irrelevant as I feel the implication of what Isaac stated makes the position of all Drone-believers a great deal MORE precarious than it first appears, here's why...

It has always been my contention that when Isaac ponders, "Why we were given this device" he means why was the human-race given this device. And so I believe it's a natural step, a logical progression to the supposition that this means that the US military/government have undertaken in communications, meetings and/or exchanges with off-world and 'non-human' sources.

It appears that the problem here is that while a human/extraterrestrial 'meet & greet' is a common theory within the UFO community, it is by no means a popular one. In my experience it is rejected as almost a complete fabrication by the vast majority of serious UFO researchers. So if you accept that Isaac is referring to humans being given this device by an extraterrestrial ("non-human" ) source then you are placing Isaac and his documents into a category that invites ridicule. And by direct association then this is where the Drones also belong, and obviously pro-Drone believers have enough problems presenting any kind of evidentiary data which supports the reality of the Drones without adding insult to injury by tying the Drones into such events as the fabled 1954 (February 20th) alien meeting when it is alleged that President Dwight Eisenhower met a couple of aliens at Edwards Air Force Base and signed off on a treaty which exchanged technology for human abductions. Granted, this is mainly espoused by Michael Salla (exopolitician extraordinaire) and others of a similar ilk, but to be honest I've always thought that ALL claims centred around extraterrestrial races engaging in interplanetary sorties to meet, greet and give us (humans) technology was a leap of faith that I could never consolidate with my personal beliefs and not surprisingly there's no corroboratory data supporting any such claim.

Let's give Isaac the benefit of the doubt and when he says, "we" he actually means CARET researchers (rather than the human race), so when Isaac wrote:

"Again, I'd be willing to bet just about anything that the device capable of hijacking the cloaking of these nearby craft was inadvertently triggered."
"The technology itself isn't ours, or at least it wasn't in the 80's."
"The device capable of remotely hijacking a vehicle's clacking comes from a non-human source too."
"Why we were given this technology has never been clear to me, but it's responsible for a lot."
"I can assure you that most (and in my opinion all) incidents of UFO crashes or that kind of thing had more to do with our meddling with extremely powerful technology at an inopportune time than it did mechanical failure on their part."
"Trust me, those things don't fail unless something even more powerful than them makes them fail (intentionally or not)."

So, as we are giving Isaac the benefit of the doubt the obviously the question is where did CARET get the device that does this from?

So how could we (humans) obtain a: "Device capable of remotely hijacking a vehicle's clacking [sic] (that) comes from a non-human source" ?

In my opinion then the only explanation (regarding this statement by Isaac) is that humans were given this device (which is capable of overriding alien technology and rendering it impotent) by the aliens themselves. And playing devils advocate then if this is what actually transpired then it raises the obvious question of why would a more advanced species give us the means of downing their craft and effectively rendering the craft powerless as well as possibly killing the occupants?