UFO-Blog.com Fighting against truth decay.....
DroneHoax.com Home - (* Denotes recently added/updated article)
Original Drone Reports

Chad - California
Wife/Mufon 7013 - Lake Tahoe
Rajman1977-Capitola, California
Listserv: Stephen, Big Basin
Ty - Big Basin, California
Isaac Caret/Pacl Documents

Related Drone History

Mufon Report (After 1 - Year)
The LMH Effect (Earthfiles.com)
The Dreamland Drones (Strieber)
The 'Walter' Drone Hoax

Dronehoax.com (Issac) Critiques

Who Is Isaac & The Drone Link
Identifying Isaac
Isaac's Alien Treaty

Linguistic Analysis Primer (LAP)
The CARET Facility

Drone Image Analysis

1111 Analysis Part 1
*1111 Analysis (HPO Model)
*1111 Antigravity Device Analysis
Biedny/Ritzman Analysis
*
Freelance_Zenarchist - LAP
JB Analysis
Jeddyhi Analysis
Kris Avery Analysis

Marc D'antonio Analysis

Marvin Analysis
Mufon/Reichmuth Analysis

Radi Analysis
Torvald Analysis
Wayne/Secret Web Analysis

Personal Beliefs, Perceptions & Reality

Skeptical Of Believers?
Marcello Truzzi - Zeteticism
The Burden Of Skepticism
UFOs - Age Of Information
Failure Of Science/Ufology
UFOs - Edge Of Reality
Logical Trickery Of UFO Skeptic
7 Warning Signs Of Bogus Skepticism
Marcello Truzzi, Pseudo Skepticism
Unfair Practices On Paranormal Claims
10 Signs Of Intellectual Dishonesty
*What Is Pseudoscience?

Additional Witness Information

Rajman1977 Additional Info
Lake-Tahoe Additional Info
Isaac - Follow-up Emails
Location, Location, Location!!

Other Online Critiques

Issac's Hoax: A Sad Story
A "Viral" Fantasy
Issac's Letter
Caret Documents - Another Hoax
A Skeptical Point Of View (Jeddyhi)

Isaac's Alien Treaty?
Isaac wrote the following under the heading, "Some Explanation for the Recent Sightings"

One question I can answer for sure is why they're suddenly here.

<snip>

The reason they're suddenly visible, however, is another matter entirely. These crafts, assuming they're anything like the hardware I worked with in the 80's (assuming they're better, in fact), are equipped with technology that enables invisibility. That ability can be controlled both on board the craft, and remotely. However, what's important in this case is that this invisibility can also be disrupted by other technology. Think of it like radar jamming. I would bet my life savings (since I know this has happened before) that these craft are becoming visible and then returning to invisibility arbitrarily, probably unintentionally, and undoubtedly for only short periods, due to the activity of a kind of disrupting technology being set off elsewhere, but nearby. I'm especially sure of this in the case of the Big Basin sightings, were the witnesses themselves reported seeing the craft just appear and disappear. This is especially likely because of the way the witness described one of the appearances being only a momentary flicker, which is consistent with the unintentional, intermittent triggering of such a device.

It's no surprise that these sightings are all taking place in California , and especially the Saratoga/South Bay area. Not far from Saratoga is Mountain View/Sunnyvale, home to Moffett Field and the NASA Ames Research center. Again, I'd be willing to bet just about anything that the device capable of hijacking the cloaking of these nearby craft was inadvertently triggered, probably during some kind of experiment, at the exact moment they were being seen. Miles away, in Big Basin, the witnesses were in the right place at the right time and saw the results of this disruption with their own eyes. God knows what else was suddenly appearing in the skies at that moment, and who else may have seen it. I've had some direct contact with this device, or at least a device capable of the same thing, and this kind of mistake is not unprecedented. I am personally aware of at least one other incident in which this kind of technology was accidentally set off, resulting in the sudden visibility of normally invisible things. The only difference is that these days, cameras are a lot more common!

The technology itself isn't ours, or at least it wasn't in the 80's. Much like the technology in these crafts themselves, the device capable of remotely hijacking a vehicle's clacking comes from a non-human source too. Why we were given this technology has never been clear to me, but it's responsible for a lot. Our having access to this kind of device, along with our occasionally haphazard experimentation on them, has lead to everything from cloaking malfunctions like this to full-blown crashes. I can assure you that most (and in my opinion all) incidents of UFO crashes or that kind of thing had more to do with our meddling with extremely powerful technology at an inopportune time than it did mechanical failure on their part. Trust me, those things don't fail unless something even more powerful than them makes them fail (intentionally or not).

As you can see, Isaac has rather specific ideas regarding why he believes that the Drones have suddenly became momentarily visible.
Isaac states unequivocally:

"One question I can answer for sure is why they're suddenly here."

In the quote from Isaac regarding where they obtained the device he wrote:

"The technology itself isn't ours, or at least it wasn't in the 80's. Much like the technology in these crafts themselves, the device capable of remotely hijacking a vehicle's clacking comes from a non-human source too. Why we were given this technology has never been clear to me, but it's responsible for a lot. Our having access to this kind of device, along with our occasionally haphazard experimentation on them, has lead to everything from cloaking malfunctions like this to full-blown crashes."

While it's clear to me what Isaac meant, the subsequently ascribed ambiguous intent of the statement by pro-Drone believers has lead to the same believers dismissing what I believe is blatantly obvious, it's the statement:

" Why we were given this technology has never been clear to me".

When considered within the context of the immediately preceding sentences, i.e.:

•  " The technology itself isn't ours"

•  " the device capable of remotely hijacking a vehicle's clacking comes from a non-human source"

Then the statement: "Why we were given this technology has never been clear to me" is in my opinion obviously referring
to the fact that the word, "we " means, "humans" and it clearly states we have been "given" the technology by a "non-human source".

Why is this even an issue?

Firstly, I should perhaps point out that the pro-Drone believers that I have seen respond to this are mainly members of the DRT (or their forum) so obviously it can't really be accepted as a fair representation of people who believe the Drones aren't a CGI hoax. But that's irrelevant as I feel the implication of what Isaac stated makes the position of all Drone-believers a great deal MORE precarious than it first appears, here's why...

It has always been my contention that when Isaac ponders, "Why we were given this device" he means why was the human-race given this device. And so I believe it's a natural step, a logical progression to the supposition that this means that the US military/government have undertaken in communications, meetings and/or exchanges with off-world and 'non-human' sources.

It appears that the problem here is that while a human/extraterrestrial 'meet & greet' is a common theory within the UFO community, it is by no means a popular one. In my experience it is rejected as almost a complete fabrication by the vast majority of serious UFO researchers. So if you accept that Isaac is referring to humans being given this device by an extraterrestrial ("non-human" ) source then you are placing Isaac and his documents into a category that invites ridicule. And by direct association then this is where the Drones also belong, and obviously pro-Drone believers have enough problems presenting any kind of evidentiary data which supports the reality of the Drones without adding insult to injury by tying the Drones into such events as the fabled 1954 (February 20th) alien meeting when it is alleged that President Dwight Eisenhower met a couple of aliens at Edwards Air Force Base and signed off on a treaty which exchanged technology for human abductions. Granted, this is mainly espoused by Michael Salla (exopolitician extraordinaire) and others of a similar ilk, but to be honest I've always thought that ALL claims centred around extraterrestrial races engaging in interplanetary sorties to meet, greet and give us (humans) technology was a leap of faith that I could never consolidate with my personal beliefs and not surprisingly there's no corroboratory data supporting any such claim.

But I digress...

Let's give Isaac the benefit of the doubt and when he says, "we" he actually means CARET researchers (rather than the human race), so when Isaac wrote:

  • "Again, I'd be willing to bet just about anything that the device capable of hijacking the cloaking of these nearby craft was inadvertently triggered."
  • "The technology itself isn't ours, or at least it wasn't in the 80's."
  • "The device capable of remotely hijacking a vehicle's clacking comes from a non-human source too."
  • "Why we were given this technology has never been clear to me, but it's responsible for a lot."
  • "I can assure you that most (and in my opinion all) incidents of UFO crashes or that kind of thing had more to do with our meddling with extremely powerful technology at an inopportune time than it did mechanical failure on their part."
  • "Trust me, those things don't fail unless something even more powerful than them makes them fail (intentionally or not)."

So, as we are giving Isaac the benefit of the doubt the obviously the question is where did CARET get the device that does this from?

It can't have been from a crashed anything as Isaac wrote,

"In my opinion all incidents of UFO crashes or that kind of thing had more to do with our meddling with extremely powerful technology." & "Trust me, those things don't fail unless something even more powerful than them makes them fail."

So how could we (humans) obtain a: "Device capable of remotely hijacking a vehicle's clacking [sic] (that) comes from a non-human source" ?

  • Especially IF they never crash or fail unless something more powerful causes it?
  • And if we already have something more powerful than their technology which caused this failure and it came from a, "Non-human" source then how could we have obtained it except as a gift or exchange?
  • If you take Isaac at face value and accept his statements and opinions he is saying that UFOs never crash by accident.
  • He also says the device that causes malfunction is from a non-human source .

In my opinion then the only explanation (regarding this statement by Isaac) is that humans were given this device (which is capable of overriding alien technology and rendering it impotent) by the aliens themselves. And playing devils advocate then if this is what actually transpired then it raises the obvious question of why would a more advanced species give us the means of downing their craft and effectively rendering the craft powerless as well as possibly killing the occupants?

Also in the following paragraph Isaac references 'different races' of extraterrestrials:

In fact, what was especially amusing about the whole affair was the way that our military management almost tried to act as if the technology we were essentially reverse engineering wasn't extra-terrestrial at all. Aside from the word "extra-terrestrial" itself, we rarely heard any other terms like "alien" or "UFO" or "outer space" or anything. Those aspects were only mentioned briefly when absolutely necessary to explain something. In many cases it was necessary to differentiate between the different races and their respective technology, and they didn't even use the word "races". They were referred to simply as different "sources".

And the following paragraph seems to hint at the fact that either communications have taken place or that the extraterrestrials have been observed performing these calculations and designing the LAP schematics:
As each new feature was added, the complexity of the diagram exponentially grew to unmanageable proportions. For this reason we began to develop computer-based systems to manage these details and achieved some success, although again we found that a threshold was quickly reached beyond which even the supercomputers of the day were unable to keep up. Word was that the extra-terrestrials could design these diagrams as quickly and easily as a human programmer could write a Fortran program. It's humbling to think that even a network of supercomputers wasn't able to duplicate what they could do in their own heads.

All of which I believe means that as Isaac and the Drones are inextricably linked then the words of Isaac are massively relevant to establishing the Drones as a 'nuts & bolts' phenomenon. And if this is the case it also seems that if you buy into Drones then you buy into Isaac, and if you buy into Isaac then this also means buying into governmental/military sanctioned meetings with extraterrestrial biological entities, and partaking in an exchange of technology with them (or receiving this technology as some sort of gift).

Not only that but it is also a direct confirmation that there are indeed multiple races of these technologically advanced extraterrestrial races and more bizarrely this is used as an identifier to differentiate between their respective technologies.

IF the military or government know half of what they are accused of and IF there is ever a concerted effort to channel this information into a 'disclosure' of any description then I believe unreservedly that this ISN'T how any such disclosure would be allowed to play out.